Well, the confusion opposition reigns. As is known, the first stone in the pond has launched D'Alema, with its proposed alliance, but constituent after praise and distinction, started the best variety and I would say the most bizarre.
Just to name one, the newspaper "The reformist" to pen his own new director Stefano Cappellini, the proposal is very unpredictable to put together the third pole, PD and Vendola area, taking out the IDV. In short, nothing new in Italian politics, the PDL falters under the weight of scandal and inefficiency of the government and an opposition that, rightly or wrongly smell of victory, began the maneuvers, the tripping each other, the ballon d'essai, launched to see the reactions of others, and of course the press diligently participate in the game and not as an active observer and commentator. Meanwhile, the primaries showed once again that, after the parenthesis of those hotly contested elections in Bologna and Naples, Vendola succeeds in placing candidates in the primaries that supports, at least those Cagliari. Another reason for the PD to impose a silence on the assumption of primary concern to the coalition to indicate the premier.
D'Alema is a great accountant, knows arithmetic, the sum of the shares of the various formations that aims to unite against the center-right, and feels confident a positive result of this hypothetical coalition. The same, however, D'Alema, of course, is not able to learn from their mistakes, and so the lesson of the beating suffered in Puglia not taught him that voters are no packages available to anyone who may have at will. I would understand in any case such a dangerous option, especially for the third prong that gives so many votes in the center, if there were no realistic alternatives to achieve victory.
other hand, as the polls are random, especially when as much as 40% of the electorate does not show a genuine intention to vote, they would at least show the possibility of tearing the Room on the majority of the votes at the center by a coalition of PD, IDV and SEL, which with the current election system would result in a strong majority, while the Senate is almost certain that the third prong is crucial.
The very fact that two opposing contend that more votes that can translate into a solid parliamentary majority in the House suggest taking a very specific case of alliances, and to proceed fairly in-house in a firm and decisive campaign election without pretense and without tripping, but with these politicians, it seems really vain hope.
0 comments:
Post a Comment