Yesterday, the newspaper "La Stampa", two separate articles have dealt with the event tomorrow, arguing opposing views. The Loewenthal, the perfect liberal, is against the event because it essentially does not believe the social dimension of ethics. So, cheers to the diversity, there are mothers, workers, entrepreneurs, and even prostitutes: it's your choice how to behave, because each individual morality is equally valid, as every color of the shirt we wear is equally worthy of being worn.
opposite attitude of Gramellini, which instead supports the event: we must dispel the idea that changes in the information world, that these players to what passes for reality TV match. To this end, we must take to the streets to give a concrete image of what is the true reality of how they are made and what they really think the women of flesh and bones.
While certainly closer to the theory of Gramellini and in favor of the event, I disagree on his optimism, namely, that it is a problem confined to a very small group of women, and so known to the general public only for media purposes. If so, if we did not fear a contagion, then there would not be so urgent that needs to manifest.
What I feel is a more complex situation, and girls I see around me, and that certainly does not accord to money, yet they tend to an instrumental use of her body, even if only in terms of image. A beautiful body is used as a weapon of public opinion, and this is in part also by males. It flaunts its beauty, not in a targeted manner that provides for the capture of a partner, or access to specific professions that require a body very well done (actress, model), but erga omnes, and placing it in an attitude to between superiority and half winking. It seems to me one way, some softer, to spend on the market certain features that should be spent in private.
I dwell so much on one aspect that I recognize marginal and not as dangerous, because at the same time I recognize ideological affinity with Olgettina.
be totally disagree with her by Loewenthal and with all the liberals who, ignoring the social dimension of moral sins only recognize as crimes. Here, the two do not coincide and should not be the same. I feel right that prostitution is not considered a crime as well as many other behaviors that I consider rather reprehensible. So not only do I claim the right to have my own specific moral views, my opinions but I want them to assume a social role, because in the end what counts is only the collective ethic, and that there always exists when a company. Although no one could propose that farting in public issue is a criminal offense, yet the collective ethic also prevents us from such behavior. They would like to prevail on these liberal fart free (free in state)?
0 comments:
Post a Comment