Is Pooping Alot A Sign Of Pregnancy

OF ITALY AS THE LOSS OF ADVANCED LIBERALISM

Today, reading an article by Barbara Spinelli, a journalist I admire, pushes me back on a matter which in the past had also addressed. In fact, this article is only a stimulus to what I'm writing, because there are many reflections that appear on why there is a phenomenon in Italy that Berlusconi in other parliamentary democracies is not the case.
The analysis in this context that I read always tend to interpret an alleged Italian anomaly in terms of defects of Italy, in short, as if Italy is lagging behind other countries. A failure to thrive, according to some, also linked to the fact that only 150 years ago was born our nation, and we went from a dictatorship to be less than seventy years.
This hypothesis is ultimately optimistic, because it suggests that with time our system will tend to heal more or less spontaneously. A second hypothesis
imagine Italy as a patient who has suddenly contracted a nasty virus, the Italians would say infected, and maybe we should find antibodies or drugs to escape from this nasty infection.
It 'clear that each of these two hypotheses can be articulated in various ways, and that term could also imagine a case that takes into account both these factors.
My argument, however, does not coincide with either, is A third option independent of these. In short, I argue that Italy, far from being in pursuit of other democracies, is located on the other hand, it is the vanguard, and therefore we expect similar situations, though certainly not the same, soon in other countries.
It is therefore a far more pessimistic view, at least as regards the fate of liberalism that dominates the world today.
In essence, the argument that it is a fundamental part of liberalism, and that we must banish the concept of social good, starting from conceiving society as free and rational interaction between individuals, in my view leads inevitably to civil degradation, and thus me the surprise is in keeping how this system that dominates such a long time starting from the west, could buckle, and continues to exist. Mind you, I do not even meravigloia who has triumphed because liberalism has all the elements to win out, but that has not collapsed, so this surprises me. We could perhaps say
easier than it should first of all that liberalism requires that all parties respect the rules, and so it seems obvious that cliques and cliques of any sort can take full advantage of the fact that others are really entrust to the market system that liberalism provides.
Finally, I would stress that the free version of liberalism that dominates today is also a factor in the deterioration dello stesso sistema, sia come potenziale riduzione dell'area di consenso, che come accewlerazione verso i disastri ambientali indotti dalla crescita ininterrotta e sempre più frenetica che esso richiede per autoalimentarsi.
Per questo, le tesi che nel mio libro avanzo credo che siano quanto mai attuali.