Scalfari's article of yesterday is really below the level of decency, one written at all acceptable, except in the first part, the substance of the arguments, but also written in a really bad from a man who has always excelled in the ability to speak instead.
begin with the sentence in which the journalist tries to answer Vendola, a masterpiece. It 'a phrase that sums up the attitude of much of Italy, including in particular the PD area, to which we ascribe (ex officio) Scalfari also the same. Vendola then remembered that the situation come now to the elections had been introduced in opposition for some time, and had, before being married, for long months have found firm opposition, I would say relentless, by nearly all the parliamentary opposition camp (with the exception indeed, Di Pietro), and also supported by certain media and in particular the Republic, a newspaper that has never hidden that you want to play a leadership role on the political center and especially on the PD.
Scalfari's response is (verbatim reporting) "I wrote it just like that because then the political and economic context in my opinion this solution and advised in this key expected the parliamentary vote on 14 December. But that vote, with its three votes in favor of the government made the difference as we know, radically changed the context ".
One might reasonably say that, even in the case of the dominance of no-confidence motion, the open end to a government of all was far from obvious. I would add that even if anything would have been a gift to Tremonti that could be supported outside of the FLI and the UDC, again relegating the opposition PD. This approach of all opposition is presumably the result of that defeat, el'aver won that day he would have rather moved away.
But the point is another, is the costume, that's true throughout Italy, shirk its responsibility in Italy not make mistakes, and if something is not the right way is always the result of circumstances.
D'Alema has not lost in Puglia, since the victory of Vendola is due to the presentation of Poli Bertone did wrong in itself, why add the votes of two opponents is an error, but significant of skill powerful to come out of Italy still standing.
Veltroni has also been the victim of friendly fire, and if they had left work, then yes that things would go on their payment.
But I say that would be a great thing if Scalfari, Bersani, D'Alema and many others frankly admit their mistakes. This story of this government of all that had to change the rules, then the emergency economic thinking, even then the conflict of interest, did lose valuable time and resources to the opposition, has long undermined the credibility, and only overtly pathological state of the psyche of today allows Berlusconi to look to the future with hope again.
Scalfari hand is doing? After hastily autoassolto, said the new opposition strategy: another masterpiece arrogance of the financial area that he represents, without seeing or maybe not even attempt to disguise the weakness of the arguments used to support.
The columnist does not merely indicate general objectives and guidelines to follow, but specific time and manner of the operation, a real place to dictate political forces who do not have any authority.
Here, I will only summarize the central aspect, referring to the same article for details. After indicating apodictically the promoters of the operation, and UDC PD, and perhaps even FLI and API (basically after. Outset and without any argument, Di Pietro and Vendola excluded from the list of sponsors), he identifies these same promoters as the only worthy form of government, but at the same time, listen, listen, telling these promoters does not exclude anyone from the majority that should support this government. In short Vendola Di Pietro courage to do the portaacqua you are always welcome!
I wonder now why a man who has achieved many milestones in his life, which also reached a remarkable age while maintaining his mental faculties, lend itself to operations so openly cunning and ultimately petty, because it uses his pen to indicate clearly the operations of part without even groped as to provide a decent argument.
short, bad timing. At the same time when new forms of opposition is manifest in society and in the squares, the usual suspects continue to want to dictate their will to want to maintain the usual seats, wanting to ensure the usual interest. For this, I am increasingly convinced that getting rid of Berlusconi to be in vain if he did not accompany us trumpets and trombones and timpani hammer with comfortable armchairs of newspapers from the sumptuous benches of parliament all go home, have failed until Just two months ago, but are always ready to fail again and especially to all of us fail.
0 comments:
Post a Comment